home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0910>
- <title>
- Jul. 11, 1994: Britain:The Man Who Shouldn't Rule
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Jul. 11, 1994 From Russia, With Venom
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- BRITAIN, Page 46
- The Man Who Shouldn't Rule
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Martha Duffy
- </p>
- <p> For the monarchy, Prince Charles' TV confession was a fiasco.
- It's hard to fathom how the embattled heir to the throne could
- replay 1992, the year his mother called her annus horribilis,
- but he has managed it. The tattle about his relationship with
- the married--and Roman Catholic--Camilla Parker Bowles had
- died down, but the scandal is back on the front page. Charles
- also showed a blithe disregard for his nation's constitution
- in revealing that he wants the coronation oath changed so he
- can be defender of all faiths, not just the Church of England--breaking a 460-year tradition. He found it "absurd" that
- a royal cannot marry a Catholic. He may have a point, but with
- Parker Bowles in the background, he was foolhardy.
- </p>
- <p> "Never complain, never explain," counseled Disraeli. Not Charles'
- motto. He is undermining the monarchy at a delicate time. His
- mother, an exemplary Queen, has hacked the sums paid to her
- relatives in return for their public engagements. She is giving
- up the yacht Britannia and paying for various other transport
- arrangements formerly supported by the public. Britain's economic
- woes partly account for these cutbacks, but the decline in royal
- popularity is also a factor: the Queen was reportedly shocked
- by her subjects' hostility to paying for repairs to Windsor
- Castle after a fire in November 1992.
- </p>
- <p> Elizabeth may be the last irreproachable monarch--perhaps
- the last viable one. Some earlier rulers have been reprobates,
- but by custom, the press protected them. Now royals are the
- cannon fodder in media wars, as the Prince of Wales found out
- when his puerile but genuinely intimate telephone talk with
- Parker Bowles--the infamous "Tampax tapes"--was leaked.
- </p>
- <p> Even Charles' foes acknowledge that he is not a villain, but
- he seems to have a self-destructive streak. Some of it is just
- banana-peel comedy. The day of the broadcast he plowed the plane
- he was piloting off the runway: he misjudged his landing approach.
- More serious is his capacity for ill-advised self-revelation,
- which raises the question of whether he is fit to rule. When
- he claimed he was faithful to Princess Diana until the marriage
- was "irretrievably broken," he may have opened himself to the
- charge of lying. The next day Andrew Morton, the author of Diana,
- Her True Story, wrote a stinging rebuttal. He asserts that the
- Camilla affair goes back perhaps even to the time of the royal
- wedding. In the past, Morton has proved to be witheringly right.
- If the monarchy stands for anything, it is for moral standards.
- </p>
- <p> At a time when Charles' judgment is being questioned, why announce
- a willingness to tinker with the constitution, the unwritten
- "document" that is the foundation of his country's culture?
- The official church is woven deeply into it, and his statement
- about changing the oath he will someday take caused immediate
- expressions of concern from several scholars. But the sharpest
- reaction came from acid-tongued leftist Tony Benn, who intoned,
- "If the Prince of Wales is moving one brick, you cannot be surprised
- if the building tumbles." Then he threw in a threat: if Charles
- persists in his course, Benn will use his position as a member
- of the Privy Council to veto the prince's accession. Many politicians
- less flamboyant than he may start examining such tactical possibilities.
- </p>
- <p> In the program, Charles bemoaned the impudent incursions of
- the press--though the royals are dependent on it. He griped
- about his job. Not only is this unseemly, it invites a flip
- riposte: if the job is such a drag, go back to farming, and
- let's call the monarchy off. This is no way to run a family
- business, and the time for royal self-indulgence has long since
- passed.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-